Join SIF yahoogroup, get answers...

Join SIF yahoogroup"

Sunday, May 31, 2009

Different Modes to crack 498a case

Dear all,

After being in SIFF forum for last 2 years & based on my own experience, i have tried to enumerate the pros & cons of retaliating the 498a family to close the case, with various modes.

Request your opinion to alter or refine the points.

Regards,
RKV
----------------------------------------------------------
DIFFERENT MODES FOR CRACKING 498A CASE:
--------------------------------------- 
1. FOLLOWING THE TRIAL & PROVING INNOCENCE.

Advantages:
1. Text book method by following judicial system & get the formal acquittal order.
2. During trial, we can file perjury U/s 340 & Defamation suit, which will destroy the 498a family completely.
3. Scope for financial compensation thru defamation suit.

Disadvantages:
1.Time consuming; have to be patient with great Indian Judiciary’s efficiency.
2.Will take anything between 1 – 5 Yrs.
3.Need to cope up half baked lawyers.
 
2. FILING COUNTER-CASES AGAINST 498a FAMILY.
Advantages:
1. By giving the same medicine to the opponents, 498a case may get over in short time.
Disadvantages:
1.Very delicate in nature. Needs to do lot of home work & legal analysis before retaliating with counter-cases.
2.Costly affair & time consuming.
3.Counter-cases may back fire, if not launched properly.
4.Some counter-cases may be of cooked nature, which will be a “misuse of law”.
 
3. COMPLAINING TO HIGHER AUTHORITIES:
Advantages:
1.Taking the case details to all levels of higher authorities such as Human rights, DGP, Collector, Commissioner, Home Secretary, Income tax Dept. etc, will solve the case in shorter time.
2.Cheaper mode & can close the case in shorter time duration.(1- 6 Months)
3.Can handle without much legal aid.

Disadvantages:
1.This mode will be applicable based on 498a family members’ profile.
2.Complaints have to be placed immediately after the threats.
3.Government machinery may not work with expected efficiency.
 
4. USING RTI APPLICATIONS AGINST 498A FAMILY:
Advantages:
1.Cheaper mode & consumes relatively lesser time to close the case.(2 – 6 Months)
2.We can screw the 498a family royally, with this “Legal Cruelty” tool.
3.May cause irretrievable damage to the opponents, apart from closure of 498a case.
4.Can handle without legal aid.
5.No limit & can fire numerous RTIs based on the opponents’ profile..

Disadvantages:
1.498a family members or witnesses needs to be government job.
2.Needs to cope up with time delay for RTI replies from govt. departments & information commission response for appeals.
3.Government machinery may not work with expected efficiency.
4.Very indirect method of attacking the opponents.
----------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

பிரபாகரன் உயிருடன் இருக்கிறாரா ? கிராபிக்ஸ் விளையாட்டா ? வேதனையா ?

பிரபாகரன் உயிருடன் இருக்கிறாரா ? கிராபிக்ஸ் விளையாட்டா ? வேதனையா ?


காசு பாக்கும் எண்ணத்துடன் , தமிழக மக்களின் ஆர்வத்தையும் அனுதாபத்தையும் தூண்டும் விதத்தில் ஒரு பொய் செய்தியை வெளியிட்டு, கிராபிக்ஸ் விளையாட்டு விளையாடி, பிரபாகரன் உயிருடன் இருப்பதாய் நக்கீரன் இதழ் பெரும் பொய் சொல்லியுள்ளது என்று செய்தி வந்திருக்கிறது.

உதாரணமாய் , புலிகளின் தளமான தமிழ் நெட்டில் வந்த இந்த பழைய (2003) செய்தியையும் புகைப்படங்களையும் பாருங்கள்
http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=8456

இந்த பழைய செய்தியில்
பிரபாகரன் உட்காந்து இருக்கும் விதத்தையும் சிறிப்பையும், நக்கீரன் அட்டைப்படத்துடன் ஒப்பிட்டு பாருங்கள் ..

முடிவுகளை நீங்களே எடுத்துக்கொள்ளுங்கள்


அன்புடன்

Tags : பிரபாகரனின் மரணம், நக்கீரன் செய்தி, பிரபாக்ரன் உயிருடன் இருக்கிறாரா ? , விதலைப்புலிகளின் தலைமை, பிரபாகரன்

File cases for giving dowry

In most of the 498A complaints lodged against husbands it is found that the girl's family says, " We gave X amount of dowry" added with the allegation that it was demanded. However, dowry giving is also an equal crime as per Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 as much as abetting it is. Even witnesses give their statements that they saw the dowry being given.
Please remember if there is a case against you and your family for demanding and taking dowry on the basis of the statements given by complainant wife and her well-wishers, then a similar case for giving and abetting also needs to be registered against the complainant wife and her well-wishers for being parties to giving dowry and abetting its exchange.
Some key points to be noted however,
1. Filing a case for "Giving Dowry" against complainant wife and her well-wishers does not mean tacit admission of "Taking Dowry" because there is a difference between giving and taking. For taking to happen, giving is a mandatory condition but the reverse is not true. For all practical purposes the dowry could be offered by dowry givers and the people offered can reject to take it. However, in this case the crime of Dowry Giving and Abetment of Dowry giving has happened and the people involved therein need to be prosecuted for this. 
2. For the 498A cases mentioned, there is prima facie evidence available in the form of "Voluntary Confessional Admission" by the complainant wife and her well-wishers that they gave dowry.
3. Although Section 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 does provide immunity to the complainant against prosecution but remember, that the immunity is available only in that instance of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 under which case of "Dowry demand and taking" is running. This means that we cannot arraign the accused in the same case under section 319 of the CrPC. However, nothing stops the husband from filing a new case based on their confessional admission. And in that case the husband (complainant herein) shall be provided the immunity.
Keeping in mind all these points, all the husbands who are facing false allegations of dowry demand and dowry taking against them have a moral bound duty to get the Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition implemented in its entirety in letter and spirit.
So all dear husbands, rain on the system with complaints that you came to know that you have taken dowry only via the FIR on you and file cases for giving dowry to you as per their own admission. The society shall get back from husbands what it has given them.


Landmark judgement & precautions before file DP3

Posted by: "Sanjay Dhupar" 

Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:06 am (PDT)




Dear all ,
 
On Based upon lot of discussion with my all siffins's friend like Mr Virag , Ajay Reddy , Sukhant , Rajesh , Nitin Dixit and may more.....also some friends from judiciary , please let me note down some points for sucessfull filing DP3 to your sweet wife & cheering FIL , BIL ...so on 
 
1) Read carefully all "affidavit" which are filed against you in any cases.
2) Catch the line , in she write that "Dowary is given via her father,mother, brother so on....."
3) Dont think that above line is sufficent.
4) Keep in cool way & have patience up to cross examination in court.
5) It is the best way to do cross exam her by you not by lawyer to keep her under mental  
    tension.
6) When u cross exam her by smiling face , you should tackle on that way that she will accept all lines what she was saying about dowary given .
7) Now u are in 100 % winning position.
8) Just get the certified copies from court of crss examination
9) Now u file DP3 application to police along with certified statement of her in court and as well as "affidavit" in courts.
10) Poilice definetly do not act properly .
11) Wait for 30 days .
12) File your application to the court under 156(3) and attach supreme court citataion which i provide the link below 
http://www.sendspac e.com/file/ ompnh2

under this citaion , sc says that two FIR  can be launch on same case. If she suppose already file 498A  agianst you this citation help you.
 
So ab to haso aur keep smile & go ahead to win against this legel terrorism  
    
 
 
 
 

http://www.sendspac e.com/file/ ompnh2

Sanjay Dhupar
Ph-0751-4070523, 94253-08423